For years the Democratic Party has been a wholly owned subsidiary of the American Trial Lawyers Association. Now, it appears, a takeover by Loony Left Inc. is under weigh. Little as one may like ATLA's agenda (the very quintessence of greed), the change of masters is not an improvement.
Yesterday Terry McAuliffe, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee, went with other leading Democrats to see Michael Moore's nutcase anti-American schlockumentary, Fahrenheit 9/11. Afterwards he gushed about one of its numerous conspiracy theories. As reported first-hand by Byron York:
McAuliffe called the film "very powerful, much more powerful than I thought it would be." When asked by National Review Online if he believed Moore's account of the war in Afghanistan, McAuliffe said, "I believe it after seeing that." The DNC chairman added that he had not heard of the idea before seeing the movie, but said he would "check it out myself and look at it, but there are a lot of interesting facts that he [Moore] brought out today that none of us knew about."A short time later, McAuliffe was asked by CNN, "Do you think the movie was essentially fair and factually based?" "I do," McAuliffe said.
Moore, who openly supports pro-Ba'athist terrorists against the United States (though I suppose that it would violate the canons of politically correct discourse to call him "unpatriotic"), has this "account of the war in Afghanistan":
Fahrenheit 9/11 devotes a significant amount of time to a fantastical theory that the war in Afghanistan was not part of a wide-ranging U.S. retaliation for the terrorist attacks of September 11, but was in fact undertaken for the financial benefit of Texas oil interests, specifically the vice president and Kenneth Lay.
The real aim supposedly was to make it possible for U.S. interests to construct a natural gas pipeline through Afghanistan from the Caspian Sea, a popular idea on far-left Web sites.
Hitherto, mainstream Democrats have avoided including the overthrow of the Taliban in their litany of President Bush's sins. That restraint appears to be fading.
John Kerry has so far been walking demurely one step behind people like McAuliffe. He was for deposing the Iraqi Ba'athists when they were against, then against the war when they were calling for an American bug-out. Now he is edging toward the bug-out position, having decided that Saddam was a non-terrorist who should have been left in power. So his associates are moving on, toward the view that the War on Terror was all a mistake and America ought to go back to sleep. One wonders whether Senator Kerry will follow them there, too. A sign of his direction will be whether he has any response to his party chairman's increasing radicalism.
Mandatory disclaimer: Senator John Kerry served in Vietnam, and the preceding remarks are not intended to question his patriotism.
Comments