Former Congressman and Ambassador Tom Foley has obvious grounds for a sentimental attachment to Washington State, which he represented for many years, ending as Speaker of the House. Nowadays, though, he lives in Washington, D.C., where since 1995 he has been a partner with the Akin Gump law firm. He sold his condominium in Spokane several years ago and owns no place of abode in the state. Nonetheless, reports Sound Politics, he still votes there, listing the home of a former administrative assistant as his “residence”.
As a strategic decision, voting in the state rather than the district makes sense. Elections are often closely contested in the one, mere formalities in the other. Perhaps I, who live in a similarly lopsided area, should emulate Mr. Foley. After all, I went to elementary and junior high school in Seattle, have relatives in the Tacoma area, visit the state frequently and could easily conjure up an address there. If I did so, there is virtually no chance that my maneuver would be thwarted by the election authorities. By their own account, they rely upon other voters to challenge those with dubious “voting homes”, and, as an experiment has demonstrated, mounting such a challenge is too much work to be a practicable check on registration fraud.
In King County alone last year, 10,000 absentee voters listed out-of-state mailing addresses. That number is implausibly large for the limited set of situations in which a legitimate voter may be temporarily residing elsewhere. One can’t help but suspect that quite a few have chosen to vote not where they live but where they think will do the most good for their party. Even if the number of “strategic residents” is only a few hundred, their votes may have been decisive in the 2004 governor’s race.
There are good reasons, which shouldn’t need to be expounded, why out-of-staters shouldn’t elect the governor of Washington, much less decide local bond issues and referenda. This is another area where electoral reform is badly needed. If it is left to fester, I suspect that we will see carpetbag voting grow more widespread and blatant as time goes on.
Comments