A little over four years ago, as today’s OpinionJournal Political Diary (just $3.95 a month for delivery to your own inbox) recalls, a van carrying Senator Hillary Clinton ran down a police officer, leaving him hospitalized with a shoulder injury (but, thankfully, nothing worse).
The incident occurred a month after 9/11 when concerns about terrorists and airports were at their height. Police officer Ernest Dymond was one of three officers guarding the gateway to the airport when a Ford van carrying Mrs. Clinton and her entourage rolled towards them at 35 mph.
Mr. Dymond tried to stop the vehicle, first by shouting at it to stop and then by banging on its side while it dragged him before stopping some 300 feet past the checkpoint. The officer injured his shoulder in the process and had to check in to a local hospital.
“I didn’t know if we had a terrorist,” Officer Dymond said of the van’s Secret Service driver. Local law enforcement officials chalked the incident up to a misunderstanding, and ordered Mr. Dymond not to give further interviews. But before the cone of silence descended on him, Mr. Dymond told NewsMax.com that he was disappointed that neither Senator Clinton nor anyone from her office bothered to talk to him, ask if he was all right or apologize.
Despite that remarkable lapse in manners, media interest in the van incident was almost non-existent, covered only briefly in the New York Post and Washington Times. Perhaps that’s because in the case of Senator Clinton, she chose not to communicate with a mere injured police officer, while Vice President Cheney’s mistake was in injuring the feelings of the entire White House press corps.
The two accidents are different, of course, but the key distinction, from the elite media’s point of view, is obvious: One involved a man they despise, the other a woman for whom they persistently cover up.
This afternoon, the Vice President will give an interview to Fox News, as oracles like National Review recommend. I can already write tomorrow’s New York Times and WaPo headlines: “Cheney Interview Leaves Many Unanswered Questions: VP Uses Friendly Forum In Attempt to Defuse Crisis Over Shooting”, and so on. The Wall Street Journal’s editorial page has captured the absurdity of the coverage of “Cheney’s Coverup”. Mockery, alas, will not silence people who have no desire to report the news in good faith.
Comments