According to the Wall Street Journal [link probably for subscribers only], the Harvard Corporation is considering whether it should fire politely request the resignation of the university’s president, Lawrence H. Summers, before the faculty adopts a motion of “no confidence” in him at the end of this month, apparently a foregone conclusion. The arts and sciences faculty voted that way last year.
The Journal’s anonymous sources say that the members of the Corporation “have become increasingly concerned that continued faculty discontent with Mr. Summers, a former U.S. treasury secretary, is hurting the university”. As evidence, they cite a decline in the percentage of alumni making donations.
That reasoning strikes me as exactly right – up to a point, Lord Corporation. I have no doubt that many alums are annoyed, but more with the faculty than the president. The most widely publicized objection to Mr. Summers is that he doesn’t subordinate scientific inquiry to political correctness. Maybe the university’s graduates see no reason to subsidize the gang of anti-intellectual poltroons who now dominate teaching at Harvard.
I realize that tenured professors, unlike university presidents, can’t be dismissed, but getting rid of Mr. Summers won’t solve the fundamental problem that this internal conflict reveals. If a Yalie may offer a friendly suggestion (and, yes, I know that Old Eli has its problems, too), the Harvard Corporation should defend the president and encourage professors who can’t bear the thought of working under someone who is only a moderate leftist to migrate elsewhere. The academic world has a surplus of Ph.D.’s and a distinct shortage of men willing to stand up to Ph.D. follies.
Comments