This afternoon, through no fault of my own, I caught a bit of Lou Dobbs’ gripefest. The subject of today’s complaint was the Republican Congress’ immigration policy: The Fence hasn’t been signed into law yet, and it’s being built too slowly, and maybe it won’t really be built at all, and the sneaky Republicans are trying to use the bill signing for – gasp! – political gain, and so on. I’m also, again through no fault of my own, on various immigration restrictionist groups’ e-mail lists, and their tone is about the same. Stanley Kurtz, a semi-restrictionist himself, captures what seems to be the prevailing mood:
I remember a couple of months ago when Mark Krikorian called on the House Republicans to refuse to go to conference with the Senate on the immigration bill. At the time, I thought that was dangerous political advice, and unlikely to happen in any case. I was wrong. The House Republicans did exactly what Krikorian asked them to. On the other hand, their move did turn out to be politically dangerous, although not for the reasons I anticipated. What got the House Republicans into trouble was sticking their necks out for a bunch of conservatives too ungrateful to give them credit for what they’d done. Is this is how we reward House members who actually do what we ask them to do – and under considerable political pressure to go the other way? To kill off the House Republicans after they take a hard conservative line at our request is not only ingratitude, it’s downright self-defeating.
For reasons that I’ve explicated many times before, I favor what most people would call an “open borders” policy along the lines advocated by Rep. Mike Pence. If the GOP had followed Rep. Pence, instead of the likes of Lou Dobbs and Tom Tancredo, it would have lost the votes of the hard core restrictionists in November. So it accommodated them – and they still sound like they’re going to stay home and sulk.
After November 7th, win or lose, I think that it will be time, on the ground of pure political self-interest, for the Republican Party to jettison restrictionism in favor of a sensible program that gives all who want to come here the right to work (not to collect welfare or vote or set up non-American enclaves) and reforms the sclerotic immigration bureaucracy. We’ve learned this year that there’s no way to please the implacable. Why try?
Comments