Which state gets the largest percentage of its electricity from wind power, the latest green fave? Vermont? Oregon? Taxachusetts? Maine? It must be some environmentally hyper-conscious place, right?
The answer is George W. Bush’s home state, Republican-dominated Texas. Today’s Wall Street Journal explains why:
In this year’s great energy debate, Democrats describe a future when the U.S. finally embraces the anything-but-carbon avant-garde. It turns out, however, that when wind and solar power do start to come on line, they face a familiar obstacle: environmentalists and many Democrats.
To wit, the greens are blocking the very transmission network needed for renewable electricity to move throughout theeconomy. . . . In addition to other technical problems, the transmission gap is a big reason wind only provides two-thirds of 1% of electricity generated in the U.S., and solar one-tenth of1%. . . .
In California, hundreds turned out at the end of July to protest a connection between the solar and geothermal fields of the Imperial Valley to Los Angeles and Orange County. The environmental class is likewise lobbying state commissioners to kill a 150-mile link between San Diego and solar panels because it would entail a 20-mile jaunt through Anza-Borrego state park. “It’s kind of schizophrenic behavior,” Arnold Schwarzenegger said recently. “They say that we want renewable energy, but we don’t want you to put it anywhere.”
Texas is the notable exception. It –
is now the wind capital of America (though wind still generates only 3% of state electricity) because it streamlined the regulatory and legal snarls that block transmission in other states. By contrast, though Pennsylvania’s Democratic Governor Ed Rendell adopted wind power as a main political plank, he and Senator Bob Casey are leading a charge to repeal a 2005 law that makes transmission lines slightly easier to build.
Similar environmentalist obstacles have been thrown up, the Journal reports, in Oregon, Nevada, Arizona, the Dakotas, the Carolinas, Tennessee, West Virginia, Maine and New York.
Should we be surprised? It’s been obvious for a long time that liberals’ preferred approach to energy issues is lowering the country’s standard of living. Their bêtes noires aren’t only coal and oil but any source of power that isn’t utterly impracticable. If somebody devised a way to generate electricity by magic, you can bet that the greenies would rush to revive laws against witchcraft.
Comments