Today’s Wall Street Journal praises the California Tax Commission’s forthcoming proposal to revise the state’s tax system dramatically, replacing the current personal income, corporate income and state sales taxes with a semi-flat personal income tax and a VAT-like “business net receipts tax”.
A point that struck me was how closely this structure resembles the one proposed for the country by Arthur Laffer, Stephen Moore and Peter J. Tanous in their recent book, The End of Prosperity. They advocate a 12% flat income tax rate, with a large personal exemption and deductions only for mortgage interest, charitable contributions and rent, plus a 12% value added tax. All but a handful of other federal taxes would disappear. The upshot, according to their calculations, would be just as much government revenue as the present system produces and improved prospects for future economic growth.
Compare that to the California proposal:
The commission would replace the current, hugely complex system with one that has no sales tax (currently 5 percent) and no corporate income tax (currently 8.85 percent). Instead, it would have a Business Net Receipts Tax of 4 percent, which would tax what a business sells minus the cost of what they purchase from other firms. It is, therefore, very similar to the Value Added Tax widely used inEurope. . . .
The personal income tax would move sharply towards the flat-tax model. There would be a personal deduction of $22,500 for individuals and $45,000 for joint filers, and only three tax rates: 2.75 percent on taxable income up to $56,000 for a couple, 6.5 percent on income above $56,000, and 7.5 percent on income above $1 million. The current tax has seven tax rates and reaches as high as 10.55 percent. There would be deductions only for mortgages, property taxes, and charitable contributions. A family could fill out its state income-tax form in five minutes.
When I read The End of Prosperity, my reaction to the tax ideas was that they were pipe dreams. On the national level, where a fundamental alteration of the tax code would create huge transitional problems, that may be the case, but California’s choice is between bankruptcy and fundamental reform, not between a not-very-good tax system and a better one. Today California’s tax burden drives away the producers who pay taxes and thus leaves the state poorer in every sense, a perfect illustration of the Laffer Curve. (Dr. Laffer himself has relocated his prosperous consulting business from California to income tax-free Tennessee.) As the prospect draws nearer of California as a Third World polity, with entrepreneurs chased out and rent seekers in the ascendant, perhaps the legislators, or at least the voters, will concentrate their minds.
Comments