The President relegated foreign affairs to a secondary position, as if we were living happily at peace. What little he did say was on the lines of, “Every day in every way, things are getting better and better”. My question: What foreign country or leader that wishes ill for America is in a worse position today than one year ago?
I even have the answer: Manuel Zelaya. If there’s another, he or it doesn’t come to mind.
That the President dislikes the outcome of the Citizens United case is his right, but he has no right to stoop to the blatant falsehood that the decision will –
open the floodgates for special interests — including foreign corporations — to spend without limit in our elections. Well I don't think American elections should be bankrolled by America's most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities.
The Court did not hold have foreigners have a First Amendment right to influence American electoral campaigns. As former Federal Election Commission chairman Bradley A. Smith points out, the law prohibits foreign nationals, specifically including foreign corporations, from making campaign contributions or engaging in independent expenditures in behalf of candidates. Citizens United didn’t overturn those prohibitions.
Ironically, it is the Obama Administration that has shown an affinity for extending Constitutional rights to foreigners, at least if they are enemy terrorists. And the Obama Presidential campaign’s Web site disabled routine security measures, making it possible for foreign nationals to contribute without detection, if they were so inclined.
Professor Smith says that the President’s statement is “either blithering ignorance of the law, or demogoguery of the worst kind”. I don’t see that those explanations are mutually exclusive.
Comments