Secretary of State Anthony Blinken informed us yesterday that “the Taliban had been reminded in recent hours that the international community is holding the group to its commitment to let anyone with valid travel papers leave Afghanistan if they choose”. He even cited evidence that the Taliban were keeping their word:
He said in the past 24 hours the Taliban had upheld its commitment in the case of a family of four Americans who had safely left Afghanistan using an overland route. A senior State Department official said Monday the Taliban was aware of the crossing, without specifying which country the Americans entered.
”The Taliban was aware” could mean that Taliban functionaries waved the family through a checkpoint. It also could mean that Taliban soldiers spotted the Americans as they passed the frontier and couldn’t catch them. In the days of the Berlin Wall, East German border guards “were aware of” escaping East Berliners. What the phrase does not suggest is an affirmative desire to make leaving the country easy.
But the true fatuousness of Secretary Blinken’s statement lies in its implicit assumption that the Taliban are open to influence by “the international community”. On the same day that he spoke, the Taliban announced the composition of its new “government”. The interior minister (in charge of the police) is the head of the al-Qa’eda-linked Haqqani Network and has a $5,000,000 U.S. bounty on his head. Four other cabinet members are terrorists who were infamously exchanged for an American deserter. (You can read more about this collection of thugs here and here.)
Do those sound like men who bow to “the international community”? Why should we expect them to? They reject all values except their own interpretation of the teachings of Mohammed and have just defeated the “international community’s” most powerful state.
As a thought experiment, suppose that Nazi Germany had conquered the whole world and had been expelled from the territory of the United States after 20 years of warfare. Would the victorious Americans give a hoot about “reminders” of international values from the Nazi-dominated “international community”? Would we feel bound to observe promises to Hitler's heirs?
The Taliban have as deep an aversion to our civilization as we have (or ought to have) to their barbarism. We cannot persuade or shame them into acting like a civilized government. (I hope that they cannot convert us.) Ideally, we would have kept them at bay, but two Presidents regarded that effort as an “endless war” from which they wanted to exit. Of course, the war didn’t end for the Taliban. They will continue to fight us, however determinedly we try to ignore them and however many reminders we send them. As e. e. cummings wrote on the occasion of another famous (though, happily, eventually reversed) Western debacle:
uncle sam shrugs his pretty
pink shoulders you know how
and he twitches a liberal titty
and lisps “i’m busy right now”
Comments