Let me begin by reminding everyone (self included) that mundane explanations for mysterious events, however far they strain credulity, are often correct. Only in fiction does life have to be probable. It’s not impossible that a Cabinet secretary’s two-month disappearance really was the product of his intense desire to spend quality time with two infants and a housemate. It’s not as if he claimed to have been abducted by Vegans. (Vegans from a planet circling Vega, I mean; abduction by terrestrial vegans – villainous for their cruelty to animals – is perfectly plausible.)
Having cleared my throat sufficiently, I now want to state the obvious. If a corporate executive drops out of public view, without warning and without a stated reason, at a time when his particular area of responsibility is in the midst of a crisis, then returns just as abruptly mouthing a “time with my family” cover story, no one believes that he just took an extended vacation. There are whispers of health issues, family problems, legal entanglements, burnout, hidden scandals.
Paternity leave has become fashionable – but two months of leave, when it would be easy to make occasional speeches, hold a press conference every couple of weeks, publish op-eds on “How President Biden Will Untangle the Supply Chains” (which staffers would write, needless to say), and otherwise maintain a presence in the world. Not only would it be easy, but, for a man with high political ambitions, a necessity. What could be more damaging to a technocratically competent façade than being absent (with secret leave) at the very time when one’s ordinarily obscure bureaucratic fiefdom has a moment to shine?
All things considered, I think that it’s fair to call this incident a mystery, perhaps bordering on an enigma. That no sleuths are seeking the solution isn’t, however, a mystery at all. Who really expected Pete Buttigieg to be anything more than a polished piece of statuary adorning a Potemkin administration?
Comments