Nothing that happens in the U.N. Human Rights Council is of much significance, which is good, because the Council is rotten to the core. It’s basically a pack of wolves charged with watching out for the welfare of lambs. Nonetheless, because Donald Trump pulled the U.S. out of that snake pit, the Bidenites rushed to get back in. They assured us that American “engagement” with the likes of Red China, Cuba and Venezuela would do something to promote the Rights of Man.
Yesterday, the U.S. delegation moved to open a debate on communist atrocities in Sinkiang (Xinjiang). The motion failed: 17 yea, 19 nay, 11 abstentions.
One could hardly ask for a better illustration of the ineptitude of the Blinken corps of “smart diplomats”. Looking at the vote count, one doubts that Donald Trump would have done worse, and he wouldn’t have been trying.
- Ukraine abstained. The U.S. has poured billions of dollars into saving that beleaguered country from Russian tyranny. Red China, the target of the resolution, is Russia’s only noteworthy ally. But the Bidenites couldn’t get a “yes” vote from Kiev.
- The principal victims of communist atrocities in Sinkiang are Moslems. Only one Moslem-majority country (Somalia) voted “yes”.
- Somalia was also the only “yes” vote from the continent of Africa.
- Brazil and India, with which our relations were improving during the Trump era, abstained. Brazil has a strongly anti-communist government (at least for a little while longer), and India has no reason to cozy up to Peking.
To call this outcome a diplomatic fiasco might be an overstatement, but it’s certainly no sign that “adults” are back in charge at Foggy Bottom.
Comments